Urban gentrification, globalisation, and the total impact these two elements will have on modern planning approaches were not taken into account by the model. The model was created on an isotropic plane that would remain motionless in the presence of a static landscape. In today’s cities, this is not an option. Because a single core in today’s age simply means a crowded and burdened land use, a more polycentric city approach would have benefited the model’s sustainability. Several pockets of mixed-use area strewn about the zoning would have relieved some of the burden on the centre. It’s also perplexing that, despite having better access to all amenities, today’s city is deemed prosperous, yet the overall land is more expensive than the suburbs, which are further out from the centre and have lower real estate values. This is in stark contrast to the situation in most American cities, where the central core is impoverished but the suburbs thrive. Unfortunately, the model says the exact opposite, making it meaningless in today’s planning situation.

The Concentric Zone approach would have been appropriate in the past for cities that lacked current concepts like transit-oriented development and smart planning. The strategy was successful in establishing the emergence of affluent neighbourhoods towards the outermost ring, but it failed to comprehend the impacts of gentrification on these areas, which would result in a change in their character as a result of increased demography. To provide a robust model that spans a century, these minor details plus a vision for the future are essential. Burgess’ notion simplified radial planning but did not provide practical solutions as a result. However, such urban land-use models cannot be denied to have numerous layers that represent the area’s cultural, social, and economic values. They also assist in the systematic documentation of existing problems and the development of regionally relevant solutions.

In order to understand and uncover something new about how a location came to be, a lot of research has been done with a lot of parameters. Fairy tales and stories from our elders, as well as scientific investigations, fall within this category. The study of the spatial arrangement of activities in a city, as well as urban form and how it influences spatial character, are two examples. The concentric zone model hypothesis, which organises activities in the form of concentric rings, is one such concept.

Based on observations and studies of numerous cities and urban expansion, these models and ideas were produced. Such research was done to better understand the spatial forms of major American and European cities including Chicago, Boston, New York, and London, among others. The findings were not applicable to all metropolitan settings, although they did function well in a few. Nonetheless, such study demonstrated a desire to learn more about how cities grew, how land use patterns shaped them, and what shaped them. Improvements continued, and greater results were achieved. Geographic location, economy, transportation, connection, city shape, and policies were added to the mix, resulting in a more complete picture and more accurate outcomes.