
Kim Dovey, Professor of Architecture and Urban Design at the Melbourne University, is the most influential urban theorist of his generation. His writing can be read as a persistent and profoundly human quest to understand how cities are actually constructed, especially by those who live at their margins. Beyond the sterile plans of the master plan, Dovey has introduced the world to a new vocabulary with which to perceive and appreciate the dense, rich, emergent, and often-resistant energy of urban life. By promoting the use of assemblage theory and applying it with profound sympathy to the critique of informal settlements, he has not only reshaped the discipline of urban design but has also given intellectual voice and authority to the millions of anonymous city-makers who build our world from the ground up.
To get to know the work of Kim Dovey is to learn to look at the city anew. It is to stroll along a busy street and perceive not only buildings and humans, but an active web of forces, wants, and bargains. His body of work has been fueled by a basic curiosity regarding the difference between the city that exists on paper and the city that exists in life.
These are not theoretical questions for Dovey. These are questions to the soul of urban justice, fairness, and human imagination. His passion has been to craft the intellectual tools to tackle these questions authentically. He is a critic who will not be satisfied with the official version but, rather, will uncover the layers of formal planning to reveal the messier, more complicated, and ultimately more fascinating realities of how places are made.
Kim Dovey’s odyssey didn’t start in the sprawling disarray of spontaneous settlements, but with a specific investigation into what constitutes “place.” In his seminal work, Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form (2005), he set out the overall thesis that would inform all his subsequent work: the built environment is never a neutral plane. Architecture and Urban Design are expressions of power. They “frame” our lives by excluding and including, by making some things possible and others impossible.
This early work gave him a critical eye to everything from the symbolism of corporate towers to the subtle politics of a suburban house. He was drawn to the ways in which places become imbued with meaning and how this meaning is most often fought over. This foundation in the interplay between form, power, and human experience provided his work with a distinctive sensibility. He knew that in order to really know a place, one must comprehend the forces—visible and invisible—that were continually remaking it.
As his questions became more probing, Dovey discovered that conventional ideas about “place” were too fixed to accommodate the dynamic, constantly shifting quality of the city. He required something capable of thinking in terms of process, relations, and flows. He discovered it in assemblage theory, a rich philosophical concept that Deleuze and Félix Guattari built.
This was a turning point in intellectual understanding for Dovey. An assemblage, he understood, was the ideal term for the city. It enabled him to perceive an urban neighborhood not as a completed object, but as a provisional settling of a vast number of interacting components:
The city, in this way, ceased to be a noun and instead became a verb. This theoretical movement provided Dovey with an entirely new vocabulary in which to explain the dynamism he had always witnessed on the ground, and it would become the sign method that he would utilize to unlock the secrets of the informal city.
Equipped with the idea of the urban assemblage, Kim Dovey set his sights on the topic that would become his most important contribution: informal urbanism. Formal planning has for centuries rejected informal settlements—slums, favelas, kampungs—as disorderly, pathological, and illegal.
Dovey’s work did a radical flipping on its head. Through his lens of assemblage, he viewed these settlements and not chaos, but another, more intricate sort of order. He noticed:
Through his careful, compassionate research, Dovey instructed the world to look at the “slum” not as a curse, but as proof of the resourcefulness and artfulness of the human spirit.
Kim Dovey’s influence goes far beyond his own work. As a mentor and educator, he has taught a generation of scholars and students to consider urban design with greater social conscience and critical sensitivity. His work has gone some way to altering the profession’s own image away from the heroic “master-planner” towards a more subtle role as an “urban catalyst” or “enabler.” The aim is no longer to impose a unified vision, but to grasp the dynamics of a place that already exist and to collaborate to create more equitable and resilient outcomes. He has given the theoretical foundation to what most community-oriented designers knew on an intuitive level: that the most effective work is listening and empowering the ones who live in a place.
The lifetime’s work of Kim Dovey is a strong reminder that our cities are, at their heart, human. They are the result of numerous dreams, battles, and negotiations. His worthy contribution has been to leave us a template that does justice to this complexity. He has provided us with a means of viewing the city not only as a physical entity, but as a constant, political, and social process. In a world confronted by unprecedented urbanization and inequality, Kim Dovey’s invitation to look beyond the official maps, to hear the marginal voices, and to listen to the emergent wisdom of the lived city has never been more necessary.
Sauhard Kukreti is an architect currently advancing their expertise through a Master’s degree in Planning, specializing in Regional Planning. Their academic and professional interests are deeply rooted in regional planning and development policies, with a focus on sustainable and efficient regional transportation and rural development. They are also keenly interested in the natural environment and its conservation, addressing climate change impacts and mitigation strategies. Furthermore, Sauhard Kukreti explores the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning to innovate within the field of regional planning.
Visualizing Urban and Architecture Diagrams
Session Dates
“Let’s explore the new avenues of Urban environment together “
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |